On December 16, 2025, the EU Commission unveiled its proposal for the Biotech Act. The proposal, which is only the first part of a bigger initiative for regulating biotechnologies, focuses primarily on the health sector. The Commission took the opportunity to broadly revise the Clinical Trial Regulation (“CTR”) – see our blog post here. In particular, it sought to better align the CTR requirements with those of the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”). This blog post provides an overview of those revisions relating to the processing of personal data during clinical trials.
Clarifying The Legal Basis For Processing Personal Data During Clinical Trials
The proposal specifies that sponsors and investigators are required to process personal data for a number of purposes in the context of clinical trials, effectively enabling these processing activities to be based on the sponsors’ and investigators’ legal obligations pursuant to Article 6(1)(c) and 9(2)(i) GDPR.
The proposal also includes a requirement for these processing activities to be subject to “appropriate technical and organizational measures”, such as the obligation to obtain the patients’ informed consent (to participate in the trial, not as legal basis) and to maintain appropriate confidentiality and security during the trial.
Clarifying The Modalities Of Processing
The proposal provides a number of clarifications regarding the modalities of the processing activities. These concern for instance:
- The obligation for sponsors and investigators to make personal data (including genetic and health data) available to competent national authorities and the Commission as needed;
- The roles of sponsors and investigators – which are both designated as data controllers of patient data (although the proposal does not explicitly clarify whether this should be a joint or a separate controllership);
- The retention period of the personal data – to be based on the CTR requirements;
- The fact that the same controller is allowed to further process personal data collected during a clinical trial for (i) another clinical trial or (ii) other medical research activities.
We expect the above clarifications will have an impact on the way informed consent forms and trial agreements are drafted across various jurisdictions. The proposed changes would also require some Member States to change their current data protection laws. In this respect, in an effort to further harmonize clinical trial practices throughout the EU, the proposal prevents Member States from maintaining or introducing further conditions for the afore-mentioned processing activities under Art. 9(4) of the GDPR.
* * *
The Covington team regularly advises the world’s top companies on their most challenging regulatory, compliance, and public policy issues in the EU and other major markets. Please reach out to a member of the team if you need any assistance.