On April 14, 2020, FDA issued a direct-to-final guidance outlining its “Enforcement Policy for Digital Health Devices for Treating Psychiatric Disorders During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Public Health Emergency.” The guidance intends to “expand the availability of digital health therapeutic devices” – possibly the first time FDA has used such term in its written policies – to facilitate consumer and patient use and reduce potential exposure to COVID-19. The guidance applies to two groups of products: (1) computerized behavioral therapy devices and other digital health devices for psychiatric disorders; and (2) low-risk wellness and digital health products for mental health or psychiatric conditions. Like FDA’s many other COVID-19 enforcement policies, the policy will remain in effect “only for the duration of the public health emergency related to COVID-19.”
Continue Reading FDA Issues COVID-19 Policy for Certain Digital Health Solutions
Wade Ackerman
Wade Ackerman advises companies and trade associations on complex and novel FDA regulatory issues, with a particular focus on cutting-edge technologies that require coordinated legal, regulatory, and public policy strategies. He works with clients across the life sciences and technology sectors—including those developing artificial intelligence, digital health tools, and other innovative technologies—helping them anticipate and navigate rapidly evolving federal, state and global regulatory frameworks.
With more than two decades of experience in private practice and senior government roles, Wade brings deep insight into the interplay of innovation, health policy, and FDA regulation. Since 2017, he has co-led Covington’s multidisciplinary Digital Health Initiative, which draws on the firm’s global resources to advise companies harnessing data and technology to transform healthcare delivery and improve patient outcomes.
Until June 2016, Wade served as Senior FDA Counsel to the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor & Pensions (HELP) Committee, where he played a central role in major FDA legislative initiatives, oversight hearings, and policy development. He helped negotiate key provisions of the 21st Century Cures Act, shaping reforms to FDA’s review and approval of drugs, devices, and digital health software.
Earlier in his career, Wade served for more than five years as Associate Chief Counsel within FDA’s Office of Chief Counsel, advising the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and the Office of Commissioner (OC) on a wide range of drug regulatory and policy issues. He was also involved in developing and implementing significant reforms, including the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) of 2012 and the Drug Quality and Security Act (DQSA) of 2013.
The Potential Benefits of Digital Health Technology in Managing COVID-19
The COVID-19 crisis is demonstrating the potential of digital health technology to manage some of our greatest public health challenges. The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy has issued a call to action for technology companies to help the science community answer high-priority scientific questions related to COVID-19. …
Continue Reading The Potential Benefits of Digital Health Technology in Managing COVID-19
Ideation Question #10: What Are the Priorities for the Solution?
This is the tenth of our video posts on 10 questions that can help lawyers contribute to the digital health ideation process. Today’s video explores the question: What are the priorities for the solution?
Continue Reading Ideation Question #10: What Are the Priorities for the Solution?
Ideation Question #4: What Data Will Be Needed to Substantiate the Offering?
Continue Reading Ideation Question #4: What Data Will Be Needed to Substantiate the Offering?
FDA Issues Updated Guidance on the Regulation of Digital Health Technologies
On September 26, 2019, the FDA issued two revised guidance documents addressing its evolving approach to the regulation of digital health technologies. These guidances primarily describe when digital health solutions will or will not be actively regulated by FDA as a medical device. In parallel, FDA also updated four previously final guidance documents to ensure alignment with the new approaches being adopted by the Agency.
As background, FDA issued draft guidance documents in December 2017 that sought to implement section 520(o)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), which was enacted by Congress in the 21st Century Cures Act of 2016 (the “Cures Act”). Those guidance documents raised a number of issues that we discussed on this previous alert.
After receiving comments from stakeholders, the Agency responded by issuing: (i) a revised draft guidance document for clinical decision support (CDS) software (“Clinical and Patient Decision Support Software” or the “CDS Draft Guidance”) and (ii) a final guidance document for other software functions exempted by the Cures Act (“Changes to Existing Medical Software Policies Resulting from Section 3060 of the 21st Century Cures Act” or the “Software Policies Guidance”).
Here are key takeaways on FDA’s newly-issued guidance:
Continue Reading FDA Issues Updated Guidance on the Regulation of Digital Health Technologies
Top 10 Questions During Ideation of Digital Health Solutions
Our clients increasingly apply agile product and business development methodologies when they are developing digital health solutions. “Ideation” is the part of that process and involves the rapid identification and creation of ideas for digital health solutions, which are then prototyped and tested. Covington has created a Top 10 Questions …
Continue Reading Top 10 Questions During Ideation of Digital Health Solutions
Senators Introduce Legislation to Regulate Privacy and Security of Wearable Health Devices and Genetic Testing Kits
Last week, Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) introduced the Protecting Personal Health Data Act (S. 1842), which would provide new privacy and security rules from the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) for technologies that collect personal health data, such as wearable fitness trackers,…
Continue Reading Senators Introduce Legislation to Regulate Privacy and Security of Wearable Health Devices and Genetic Testing Kits
FDA Announces Public Workshop on Using Randomized Clinical Trials to Generate Real-World Evidence
Today, FDA published a notice in the Federal Register announcing a public workshop on July 11-12 entitled “Leveraging Randomized Clinical Trials to Generate Real-World Evidence for Regulatory Purposes.” This workshop builds on FDA’s ongoing efforts to implement the Real-World Evidence (RWE) Framework published in December 2018, which we previously discussed…
Continue Reading FDA Announces Public Workshop on Using Randomized Clinical Trials to Generate Real-World Evidence
FDA Outlines Proposed Framework for Regulating Artificial Intelligence Software
On April 2, 2019, FDA released a discussion paper entitled “Regulatory Framework for Modifications to Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)-Based Software as a Medical Device (SaMD)” (the “AI Framework”). The AI Framework is the Agency’s first policy document describing a potential regulatory approach for medical devices that use artificial intelligence (“AI”) and machine learning (“ML”). The AI Framework does not establish new requirements or an official policy, but rather was released by FDA to seek early input prior to the development of a draft guidance. FDA acknowledges that the approach “may require additional statutory authority to implement fully.”
In an accompanying press release, former FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb outlined the need for a “more tailored” regulatory paradigm for algorithms that learn and adapt in the real world. FDA’s medical device regulation scheme was not designed for dynamic machine learning algorithms, as the Agency traditionally encounters products that are static at the time of FDA review. The AI Framework is FDA’s attempt to develop “an appropriate framework that allows the software to evolve in ways to improve its performance while ensuring that changes meet [FDA’s] gold standard for safety and effectiveness throughout the product’s lifecycle.”
Continue Reading FDA Outlines Proposed Framework for Regulating Artificial Intelligence Software
Key Takeaways from FDA’s Framework for Real-World Evidence for Pharmaceuticals
On December 7, FDA published the much-anticipated “Framework for FDA’s Real-World Evidence Program” for drugs and biological products (the “Framework”). In a statement announcing the Framework, Commissioner Gottlieb recognized the opportunities and challenges of using real-world data (“RWD”) and real-world evidence (“RWE”) to enhance regulatory decision-making and noted that leveraging this information is “a top strategic priority for the FDA.” FDA opened a docket for public comments on the Framework through February 5, 2019.
The Framework focuses in particular on the use of RWE to support regulatory decisions about effectiveness. The agency outlines three considerations that will guide its overall RWE Program and inform the agency’s assessment of individual drug applications. The Framework also offers background on the agency’s previous use and current initiatives with respect to RWE and related topics, such as innovative clinical trial designs. This blog post provides an overview of FDA’s proposal and highlights a few initial takeaways noted by Covington’s Digital Health team.Continue Reading Key Takeaways from FDA’s Framework for Real-World Evidence for Pharmaceuticals